archive.md
archive.ph

But it also created public sector boards (or “joint ventures”) where chief executives from various agencies meet and discuss issues and provide advice to a single Government minister.

If it sounds a bit wishy-washy that’s because it clearly is. Its stated goal was to tackle major underlying problems facing the country. How’s that working out for us?

I get that this is a right wing columnist and he’s paid to be anti, but come on. Companies always decry silos and that’s exactly what this was set up to overcome when dealing with “wicked” problems, of which NZ has many.

  • TagMeInSkipIGotThis@lemmy.nz
    4·
    3 days ago

    They also never talk about why the public services under Labour led governments tend to hire more.

    1. Because National governments get rid of so many the Ministries struggle to get the work they were asked to do done so hire consultants & contractors
    2. Because Labour led governments typically want the Ministries to do more things to fill the gaps in need that the private sector leaves
    3. Because Labour led governments typically see a need to have a public service overseeing compliance from the private sector, whereas National led governments typically think its fine for private sector to regulate & monitor itself.

    etc, etc, etc.

    Talking about a number of people is a useful tool for propagandists like Bridge, but it dumbs down the discussion when we lose all the context about why we might, or might not, need certain numbers of people working in the public sector.

    Also, his arguments (like most from the neo-liberal right) assume the magic of the private sector, as if there’s not vast amounts of waste happening in corps all the fricking time as well.