The unmoving and unchanging state of ownership and the permanence of bourgeois rule is presupposed by your argument.
You are trying to prove the insufficiency of an argument by making a counterargument that is even more insufficient.
We have seen centuries of proto-capitalism, centuries of early capitalism, a century of conflict between hegemonic capitalism and socialism in which the majority of communist gains and inroads were turned back by the bourgeoisie. Bourgeois rule is chaotic and systematically self-reproducing (like the rule of nobility was), but the historical sample and trajectory does not suggest its imminent defeat by the proletariat.
As technology advances, so too do the mechanisms of social control. Global capitalism has proven its ability to adapt to change and subsume any threats, and we are now facing a potentially species-ending polycrisis. You can’t simply wave your hand and say “Marx assures us this specific outcome will happen, therefore the workers will be in control over AI”. It’s 100% counterfactual.
Having a fully informed perspective, or a clear foundation, for all of human technology is what Awoo is arguing for.
You are trying to prove the insufficiency of an argument by making a counterargument that is even more insufficient.
We have seen centuries of proto-capitalism, centuries of early capitalism, a century of conflict between hegemonic capitalism and socialism in which the majority of communist gains and inroads were turned back by the bourgeoisie. Bourgeois rule is chaotic and systematically self-reproducing (like the rule of nobility was), but the historical sample and trajectory does not suggest its imminent defeat by the proletariat.
As technology advances, so too do the mechanisms of social control. Global capitalism has proven its ability to adapt to change and subsume any threats, and we are now facing a potentially species-ending polycrisis. You can’t simply wave your hand and say “Marx assures us this specific outcome will happen, therefore the workers will be in control over AI”. It’s 100% counterfactual.
Having a fully informed perspective, or a clear foundation, for all of human technology is what Awoo is arguing for.