Yeah. I agree. I time it to 2014 and can see Gamergate, now in retrospect, as a clear part of the origin story of the current moment. And one of the clearest signals is how befuddling and practically impossible it is to actually understand what gamergate is/ was. I was there for it, in the sense that I saw it happened, but it was noise at the periphery of my vision. And even what I did right there, the swapping of a subject word to an action word; how language around this “gamergate” thing evolved, and how it became completely befuddling to those not already interior to this thing to understand.
And I still dont understand it. And I don’t think others, even those deeply involved understand it either. But I want to be clear when I say “understand”, I’ve done a fair bit of research. I’ve pulled every reddit forum post on the matter. I’ve read book chapters and deep articles. But with the Epstein files and Bannons involvement, which we only now understand: it sure was “something”.
MY current working hypothesis; I think gamergate was the test run for Brexxit. And the test run for MAGA/J6. I think there is potentially also a Hungary and Orban, which preceded gamer gate.
I don’t know if it was a test run or if it showed the ability to weaponize Extremely Online folks.
I remember gamergate as something that, on the surface, looked like possibly legitimate criticism, but then as you said, people that went into it became kind of odd, with their own language used to describe it which didn’t really make sense. Like, the words were there, but they were using kinda tortured definitions in a way that weaponized them (…into a misogynistic culture war).
Personally, I’ve always been fascinated with language as someone who basically grew up bilingual, and picked up a few along the way since. There are concepts that I simply am unable to discuss in certain languages, because the words are not there.
Weaponized language had been around for some time. Hell, Gingrich basically made his career by using specific loaded phrases in speeches given to an empty senate chamber, specifically for the weirdos who watch C-SPAN. Similarly, you had some insular (often hate) groups that had their own internal lingo. Gamergate seems to have combined the two in a way that is now becoming increasingly common in politics.
Like I said, I’ve gone as far as pulling the entire archive of reddit from this time. My original intent was to try and look for correlations between things in the threads and the epstein files. Dug a bit in then life well. #projects
I’ve still got the data on my stacks. Perhaps another month.
Yeah. I agree. I time it to 2014 and can see Gamergate, now in retrospect, as a clear part of the origin story of the current moment. And one of the clearest signals is how befuddling and practically impossible it is to actually understand what gamergate is/ was. I was there for it, in the sense that I saw it happened, but it was noise at the periphery of my vision. And even what I did right there, the swapping of a subject word to an action word; how language around this “gamergate” thing evolved, and how it became completely befuddling to those not already interior to this thing to understand.
And I still dont understand it. And I don’t think others, even those deeply involved understand it either. But I want to be clear when I say “understand”, I’ve done a fair bit of research. I’ve pulled every reddit forum post on the matter. I’ve read book chapters and deep articles. But with the Epstein files and Bannons involvement, which we only now understand: it sure was “something”.
MY current working hypothesis; I think gamergate was the test run for Brexxit. And the test run for MAGA/J6. I think there is potentially also a Hungary and Orban, which preceded gamer gate.
I don’t know if it was a test run or if it showed the ability to weaponize Extremely Online folks.
I remember gamergate as something that, on the surface, looked like possibly legitimate criticism, but then as you said, people that went into it became kind of odd, with their own language used to describe it which didn’t really make sense. Like, the words were there, but they were using kinda tortured definitions in a way that weaponized them (…into a misogynistic culture war).
Personally, I’ve always been fascinated with language as someone who basically grew up bilingual, and picked up a few along the way since. There are concepts that I simply am unable to discuss in certain languages, because the words are not there.
Weaponized language had been around for some time. Hell, Gingrich basically made his career by using specific loaded phrases in speeches given to an empty senate chamber, specifically for the weirdos who watch C-SPAN. Similarly, you had some insular (often hate) groups that had their own internal lingo. Gamergate seems to have combined the two in a way that is now becoming increasingly common in politics.
Like I said, I’ve gone as far as pulling the entire archive of reddit from this time. My original intent was to try and look for correlations between things in the threads and the epstein files. Dug a bit in then life well. #projects
I’ve still got the data on my stacks. Perhaps another month.