• NoTagBacks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    At that point I would definitely look at the mileage. You also need to consider the wear/tear on the suspension, transmission, brakes, steering, etc. I’ve seen far too many people put off regular suspension maintenance leading to other complications later on down the line. If a worn suspension can fuck up motor mounts and tie rod ends, I’d imagine they can rattle those battery packs as well. So I wouldn’t think of mileage so much as the “age” of a car so much as it’s “experience”. Much like how we measure the “age” of aircraft in flight hours. More flight hours = more stress on the frame.

    So yeah, more getting to the actual spirit of your inquiry; mileage is gonna matter more to longevity for the vehicle as a whole over charge cycles. On top of that, the battery on the higher mileage vehicle is at higher risk of some form of mechanical failure despite same capacity/lower number of charge cycles.

      • homik@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        If the power isn’t transmitted from the motor to the motee (wheels), there’s not going to be motion.

        A less confusing term used for the unit between a motor and a differential in an EV is reduction gear. But all the moving parts and their supports, the power transmission, is a point of wear worth considering.

    • darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Point taken about other components being the limiting factor. My only point is that if two cars have similar miles/kwh but vastly different ranges, they could both end up showing 90% with 150,000 miles but the car that did that with the smaller range is much more impressive.