• Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Sure, and the existence of randomness itself is debatable. “Unreliable as fuck” could be a better description.

    “AI” as in machine learning to do, whatever, audio transcription or translation, recognising bird noises and whatnot, sure. It’s a tool, it’s not very useful yet but it could be in specific contexts. That kind basically stopped being developed a few years ago.

    Now generative “AI” and LLMs? Those are garbage. Anyone with a different opinion is deluded. Destroying the world and humanity for the sake of mass-producing trash slop? There is no “time and place” for that other than never and nowhere.

    And like, for fuck’s sake, anyone with a brain knows that when all the billionaires suddenly bet on something, it’s not something good.

    We went through the blockchain, through NFTs, now it keeps on getting worse and worse and yet people must be becoming dumber and dumber for falling for it again and again.

    • hyperion626@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s pretty clear to me you don’t know what you’re talking about and that you have no interest in learning.

      Sooo I’m going to discontinue this conversation and do something more useful with my time. Like watching grass grow or timing how long it takes for paint to dry.