Lady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.com to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 3 days agoWhat's your thoughts on the Lyndsey Clancy case?message-squaremessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down127
arrow-up1-14arrow-down1message-squareWhat's your thoughts on the Lyndsey Clancy case?Lady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.com to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squaredisregardable@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·3 days agoNo, it’s not illegal for a juror to come to a different conclusion than the rest of the panel. people are so annoying.
minus-squareStarya67@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·3 days agoJuries should not make medical decisions anyway. Apparently that conclusion contradicted “reasonable doubt”, by the way.
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·3 days agoJuries shouldn’t make decisions period.
minus-squareRicky Rigatoni@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoHonestly nobody should make decisions. Just leave it up to the dice rolls.
minus-squareLady Butterfly she/her@reddthat.comOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·3 days agoFrom what I’ve read they refused to apply the law as directed by the judge. I totally support them having a different verdict but this is different
minus-squaredisregardable@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·3 days agoThat is the interpretation of the people who disagree with his conclusion.
No, it’s not illegal for a juror to come to a different conclusion than the rest of the panel. people are so annoying.
Juries should not make medical decisions anyway.
Apparently that conclusion contradicted “reasonable doubt”, by the way.
Juries shouldn’t make decisions period.
Honestly nobody should make decisions. Just leave it up to the dice rolls.
From what I’ve read they refused to apply the law as directed by the judge. I totally support them having a different verdict but this is different
That is the interpretation of the people who disagree with his conclusion.