• wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Precisely. I’m saying that, if we already have it anyway, we ought to regulate it. If we can abolish it, great. If not, then it should be heavily regulated, with the funds earmarked for things that aren’t enforcement-related, so that there’s less perverse incentive for law enforcement to just grab things for shits, giggles and greed. The government can and will seize your home for nonpayment of taxes, so it’s not like this doesn’t already happen outside of civil asset forfeiture. It’s just a matter of how well-regulated the system is, and what steps are taken to reduce perverse incentives.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      less perverse incentive for law enforcement to just grab things for shits, giggles and greed

      Shits, giggles and power trips are the only reason most LEOs get into the career in the first place. If they’re greedy, they go into politics.

      • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        In the current situation? Absolutely. I’m fairly certain it would take a violent uprising, then a constitutional convention, to actually count the US as a country with laws. It’s full, mask-off kakistocratic corpofascism.

        There are, however, individual states and jurisdictions which could implement it well with reform.