Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-210 days agoPeople only hate ai because they have access to it. If it were too expensive for the common folk it would be seen as luxurious or elite.message-squaremessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down199file-text
arrow-up1-94arrow-down1message-squarePeople only hate ai because they have access to it. If it were too expensive for the common folk it would be seen as luxurious or elite.Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-210 days agomessage-square47fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·10 days agoLoss leaders are a thing. The problem is the ai companies don’t have the high margin alternative products to offset the losses.
minus-squareXaphanos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·10 days agoWe most certainly do. Pharma work pays big, for example.
minus-squarefake@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·10 days agoDo pharma need LLM chuds though?
minus-squareDaftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·10 days agoSounds like a problem for ai companies to solve unless your concern is their success or larger economical impacts. Not a real critique of the technology itself.
Loss leaders are a thing. The problem is the ai companies don’t have the high margin alternative products to offset the losses.
We most certainly do. Pharma work pays big, for example.
Do pharma need LLM chuds though?
Sounds like a problem for ai companies to solve unless your concern is their success or larger economical impacts. Not a real critique of the technology itself.