A committee of professors and students spent 5 months studying how AI changed learning on campus, and the findings read like a warning to every university on the planet.
⭕ Study groups are disappearing.
⭕ Office hours are emptying out.
⭕ Problem sets and take-home exams no longer prove anything, because AI can produce credible solutions to almost any written assignment in the undergraduate curriculum.
⭕ Students who lean on chatbots lose mastery and confidence, and some slip into what the report calls cognitive surrender, reaching for AI at the first hint of struggle.
The committee warns MIT professors against replacing undergraduate research assistants with AI agents just because they’re cheaper, because a university exists to grow people, not output.
Ad hom, nice touch. Find a hole to scream into.
that isn’t an ad hominem argument.
you really have no idea how logical fallacies work or where they apply, it’s hilarious. it’s just name-calling to you. a nice way for you to dismiss other people because well, it would take effort for you to actually engage with the argument rather than dismiss it.
you can prattle on all you want about how memorization is stupid, but I’d like to know you do anything in life on a daily basis without memory. or do you like look up how to do your laundry on your phone every single time you do your laundry because ‘memorization is stupid and i can just look it up each time’.
you should interact with people who have memory issues. it will blow your mind to see what someone who can’t remember things actually functions, and maybe make you realize how totally dependent you are on memorization of things. very much like how you probably never thinking about walking or other bodily movements, but you would if you became paralyzed.