MadeInDex 📰🌎@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agoGDPR trap Smart Glasses: Why Ray-Ban Meta wearers can be held liablewww.heise.deexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1199arrow-down13cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zipprivacy@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1196arrow-down1external-linkGDPR trap Smart Glasses: Why Ray-Ban Meta wearers can be held liablewww.heise.deMadeInDex 📰🌎@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zipprivacy@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareundrwater@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 hours agoAnother solution would be to make centralized facial recognition systems illegal. That way, you can still carry your phone around and not be charged with “concealed carry of a camera”.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 hours agoyeah, then meta moves to process the video on your phone when it gets the chance, and upload the results to themselves. That way, you can still carry your phone around and not be charged with “concealed carry of a camera”. its strange because we usually don’t take it that way, but that is actually concealed carry of a camera
Another solution would be to make centralized facial recognition systems illegal.
That way, you can still carry your phone around and not be charged with “concealed carry of a camera”.
yeah, then meta moves to process the video on your phone when it gets the chance, and upload the results to themselves.
its strange because we usually don’t take it that way, but that is actually concealed carry of a camera