• grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Didn’t really need this analogy, as it’s not as clear in this case, more like a child was able to start a run of papers on their own and cost the printer $100k running the printers for 15 minutes.

    Should they have been in the printers with access to the buttons? No

    But again it’s Google

    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Should they have been in the printers with access to the buttons? No

      agreed, the kid absolutely should not have had access to it. And Google explicitly forbids it. But the dad put the kid in front of it anyway and said “you can use it, but only up to 20 bucks” and walked away