• Cyril Strobe@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Not necessarily: pretty sure people might argue that saying princesses are just for girls, for example, is sexist, but not misogynistic. Depends on the context ig. In the quote above, putting them together is about emphasis on the negative more than anything, so it does serve some purpose, even if the meaning is similar

      • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        But if that were the case, it would be possible to be sexist, without being misogynistic. Or vice versa, how would that work? I cannot discriminate against women, if I don’t think that they’d be worse than men in some way.