Proposed KDE LLM guidelines (#187) · Issues · Plasma / Plasma Workspace · GitLab
invent.kde.org
This is a continuation of this mailing list thread about "fully LLM-generated merge requests, preserved at https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-devel/2026-September/004496.html There, I proposed...
  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
    83·
    19 hours ago

    contributors must hide the fact they use LLMs

    communication between contributors is to be minimized to what they think each other would read if they suspect the contribution was AI

    So, what this means for KDE is, into the trash it goes?

    • ragas@lemmy.mlEnglish
      1·
      2 hours ago

      Quoting in bad faith, very constructive.

      This completely warps the intent of the actual text. The second quote doesn’t even exist.

    • HouseWolf@pawb.socialEnglish
      81·
      10 hours ago

      I REALLY don’t understand this part. Not requiring disclosure is one thing (that I already don’t approve of).

      But out right stating you shouldn’t be open with users and contributors just goes against I want in an open-source project. It’s already got me looking into Sway.

      I also feel a bit bitter since I literally donated money to a project I assumed wasn’t huffing the Ai Jenkem and I could keep using and recommending in good faith for the foreseeable future.