• PokerChips@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      While this may be true, I don’t understand what this has to do with a tool that peaches privacy requiring a tool that violates all aspects of privacy.

      EDIT: ah I believe you are saying that I never should have expected such purism in the first place.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I believe you are saying that I never should have expected such purism in the first place.

        What I’m saying is that Signal have a conflict of interest when it comes to Google and other customers.

      • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hey, at least their clients are open source so you know that their chats are actually encrypted.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well yes and no. You can compile a client yourself but you can’t use it with the official server, you have to use the binaries they put out for that. So there’s a bit of a gap there.