Seems they (the article) worded it in a pretty uncharitable way. If we’re comparing likelihoods, then it’s a big difference like you said almost 50% more likely. That’s like saying something going from 1% likelihood to 5% is a 4% increase, instead of saying 5x more likely.
7.5% sounds small, but at 120k miles, there are 50% more failed gas cars than EVs, that’s a pretty staggering number.
Seems they (the article) worded it in a pretty uncharitable way. If we’re comparing likelihoods, then it’s a big difference like you said almost 50% more likely. That’s like saying something going from 1% likelihood to 5% is a 4% increase, instead of saying 5x more likely.
deleted by creator