lemmy.net.au
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days ago

Returning from vacation? The government can search your phone without a warrant.

arstechnica.com

external-link
message-square
50
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
  • privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
149
external-link

Returning from vacation? The government can search your phone without a warrant.

arstechnica.com

schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days ago
message-square
50
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
  • privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Reminder: The "border exemption" to your rights is real.
  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    No. They already had him and the device, and he gave them the wipe pin when they asked him for the unlock pin. That’s destruction of evidence.

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Destruction of what evidence? They didn’t have the phone unlocked. How do they even know anything was destroyed?

      They’ve got nothing and it’s going be dismissed.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, you try that in court. See how it goes for you.

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      deleted by creator

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I doubt any court would agree with you.

        • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I looked it up and they cover the definition pretty well, that’s why i deleted the comment.

          https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2232

Privacy@lemmy.world

privacy@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.world

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 184 users / day
  • 1.17K users / week
  • 2.34K users / month
  • 7.45K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 10.8K subscribers
  • 495 Posts
  • 3.82K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • iopq@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org