All nations within the Anglosphere (US, UK, CA, AU & NZ) have JD imposed towards citizens. I know that the US & Canada both inherited that from Britain, which explains why they have it. However, should it be entirely only the judge making the conviction (some countries operate on a lay-judge system meaning juries aren’t used, such as Finland or Japan for example) rather than leaving that decision up to jurors?


Would you rather have 12 people from the street judging what kind of medical treatment is best for you, or just a single medical specialist?
Such a shit comparison lol wtf
That really depends on the Doctor
Hard agree.
It could go either way.