• Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It disagreeing with him across a wide variety of issues is how you know it’s at least passably intelligent.

    I figure it’s like Grok, if it’s not just actually Grok with a skin - Grok’s system instructions tell it to be neutral and fact-seeking without political bias but also to adopt certain right wing positions that aren’t. It’s why it keeps wavering between telling every eight winger that they’re an idiot and becoming Mecha-hitler - it can’t follow two contradictory goals so it prioritizes one and which one drifts.

    • CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s also been given a specific philosophical framework to follow. That it’s supposed to be an unbiased “truth seeker” is just a lie.

      There is no conflict between its instructions. What there’s a conflict between is what it is told are reputable sources to plagiarize and the positions it is forced to take.