• sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    People are just used to kWh. There’s nothing about it that’s more intuitive, it’s just more familiar.

    No, you’re arguing for a second-based unit in a context where the hour-based unit dominates common use. The reason why we use hours is because hours is much more familiar across the contexts where electrical usage is metered: monthly bills, daily production/consumption cycles. Everyone knows that 3 days is 72 hours but pretty much nobody can come up with the answer in seconds without actually applying a conversion factor and making the calculation.

    Energy is especially prone to the problem of how it’s calculated, simply because it’s such an important quantity to measure or calculate. Sometimes we use calories or electron volts because those make for easier conversions to other quantities in the context of temperature/heat or particle physics, respectively.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, you’re arguing for a second-based unit in a context where the hour-based unit dominates common use

      Yes. Common use. You’re making my point for me. It’s what people are more familiar with.

      is much more familiar across the contexts where electrical usage is metered

      Yes, it’s what people are more familiar with.

      Everyone knows that 3 days is 72 hours

      Who cares about 3 days? Do you run your hair dryer for 3 days or 60 seconds? Do you cook something on the stove for several minutes, or several days?

      Again, it’s just what people are familiar with.

      • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s what people are more familiar with.

        Yes, I’m advocating for using hours as a familiar unit, instead of kiloseconds or megaseconds or teraseconds. You’ll never get the world on metric time.

        Who cares about 3 days

        Everyone? If I’m doing calculations for solar panel production, it’s a lot easier to work with hours instead of seconds. If I’m dealing with usage patterns across the weekly cycle of business days and weekends, hours is a much easier unit to work with than seconds.

        We organize time around hours and days, so it only makes sense for there to be an hour-based unit for easy conversion.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, I’m advocating for using hours as a familiar unit

          Like hogsheads per rod.

          instead of kiloseconds or megaseconds or teraseconds. You’ll never get the world on metric time.

          Those might be used eventually at some point in the future, but right now our life is dominated by the rotation of the earth, the movement of the earth around the sun, etc. So, other units that correspond to those natural events make sense.

          But, I’m not advocating anything radical, just use the standard SI unit for energy instead of some awkward non-SI unit based on SI units where the only thing it has going for it is that it’s familiar.

          If I’m doing calculations for solar panel production

          You aren’t, I can tell because you advocate for kWh. And your denominator in that case wouldn’t be “per 3 days”.

          We organize time around hours and days

          And minutes, and seconds. Most of us use all of these.

          so it only makes sense for there to be an hour-based unit for easy conversion.

          No, it doesn’t. Joules are the unit that makes sense when talking about energy.

          • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Do you get this upset about the world using km/h instead of m/s? How about hectares instead of a power of 3 of square meter?

            Or electron volts in particle physics? Or calories in food?

            People use these because the conversions are easier in the contexts where they’re discussed.