Idiocracy, here we come.

  • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    51 minutes ago

    it’s not excuses, just (informed) theories about material conditions that could lead to this

    what’s your explanation for this? genuinely curious

    i’m kinda doubtful that the blanket “technology = bad” thesis in the article is true, honestly. i’m obviously not a neuroscientist but it seems super reductive and simplistic to me, and altho i believe that yes reliance on short-form content and ai summaries isn’t good for your attention span, that’s 1. not the same thing as intelligence and 2. faaaaar from being exclusive to gen z (or gen alpha for that matter). look at any older person with a phone and you’ll see it. my parents waste a ton of time on the glowing rectangle too and they treat the google summary like the gospel

    • Pratai@piefed.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      Check the other comments. Someone posted links from better sources that cite the actual studies. You may not like the results, but that doesn’t make them less true.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        This has a ring of “it’s not racist if it’s true”. The people aren’t different, they were dealt a different hand. Nobody is disputing that the studies, which probably just measure test scores, are incorrect.