From “Uncle John’s ‘Slightly Irregular’ Bathroom Reader”

  • Augustiner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yeah, approaching these things with stringed logic breaks them usually. Same goes for vampire reproduction for example. If they turn the people they feed on, how come the world isn’t filled with vampires by now? There should be exponential growth in the number of vampires. Or Dracula needing to sleep on sacred home soil. Does it have to be from his exact crypt? How does he know the limits? Could he dig 1000 meters down and the soil would still work? How does a new vampire find their home turf, if they don’t have a family with a crypt?

    You can go on endlessly poking holes, but that just takes the fun out of it. A good level of suspense of disbelief is always needed to enjoy those stories.

    • ominous ocelot@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You can go on endlessly poking holes, but that just takes the fun out of it.

      I enjoy poking and scratching at the surface of things. It’s fun, too. :)

      A good level of suspense of disbelief is always needed to enjoy those stories

      Agreed. All I need is a good, well played and emotionally touching story. Any movie is just a stage play with patterns like a tension arc, stereotypes and plot devices. Movies are not the reality. But for me there must be some degree of plausibility or scurrility or both. Usually when the movie is boring, emotionally uninvolving or annoying, I start to notice the plot holes and start digging.

      And then there are the experts in their field, having a hard time. Police men, pathologists, IT people, who call the directors bullshit. Movie makers who notice and are distracted by patterns and techniques used in the movie. But other people don’t mind.