If they could draw or make music, they wouldn’t need a robot to do it, and they clearly want to but don’t have the skills.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I tesponded to each of those reasons and countered them easily. AI is no different than all the other late stage capitalism products that extract money and value from everything they can with no concern for anything else. I’m not saying it is great, I am saying it is just like everything else. In some cases it is less damaging than other things we already have/do like burn oil.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      False equivalence fallacy. Just because two things are bad doesn’t mean they are equally bad. You want to “easily counter” any of my points? Prove them incorrect with facts.

      You’ll probably have to get a robot to do the thinking for you so have fun with that.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I didn’t say equally bad. I said AI is actually less bad then things like bruning oil. I also said the impact of my use of AI is outweighed by one airline flight. You have yet to even respond to my points because you know they are correct. While I have countered nearly all of yours. So maybe you really need a robot to think for you, cause you clearly can’t think on your own.