Pearl@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 5 days agoThank god the debt got blown up so that suppressors are tax freelemmy.mlimagemessage-square319fedilinkarrow-up1496arrow-down116
arrow-up1480arrow-down1imageThank god the debt got blown up so that suppressors are tax freelemmy.mlPearl@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 5 days agomessage-square319fedilink
minus-squarekoper@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·edit-25 days ago “there is no valid argument […] for […] taxing suppressors” This sounded like you were arguing that they should be tax-exempt.
minus-squaretheunknownmuncher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·5 days agoThe problem with your comment, yet again, is “tax-exempt” is a meaningless term in this context. What does that mean, exactly? Exempt from what tax?
minus-squarekoper@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 days agoI am merely trying to decipher your words. So why don’t you just tell us what you mean?
minus-squarePyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 days agoPrior to this bill, the sale of a supressor would incur an additional $200 federal tax on top of whatever state sales tax was owed.
This sounded like you were arguing that they should be tax-exempt.
The problem with your comment, yet again, is “tax-exempt” is a meaningless term in this context. What does that mean, exactly? Exempt from what tax?
I am merely trying to decipher your words. So why don’t you just tell us what you mean?
Prior to this bill, the sale of a supressor would incur an additional $200 federal tax on top of whatever state sales tax was owed.