From my perspective, the hive is reflexively downvoting me for saying I used AI, without bothering to evaluate anything I said. It didn’t come up with this on its own. It just pulled sources for me and raised points such as the diesel expert ban, which I was not aware of. I offered my own thoughts too.
AI will at least engage with my point. I’ve yet to hear anyone here, despite all these downvotes, interested in talking about the Russian diesel ban.
When you guys read from wherever you get your stuff, a lot of it is AI generated and you don’t even know it. It’s unavoidable, and it isn’t my fault.
The problem with leaving your critical thinking to AI is that you don’t build any of those skills yourself
Tell me why I’m wrong then. And would my comment have gotten upvotes if I hadn’t mentioned Claude?
Edit: Also, this is just rude. Judge the comment on its own terms. I told you where I got the idea from.
Edit 2: Who’s laughing now? https://www.politico.com/news/2026/10/10/trump-zelenskyy-russia-ukraine-01115841
“I used ai so I do t have to think.”
“Please think.”
“Tell me why I should think”
This is the problem.
From my perspective, the hive is reflexively downvoting me for saying I used AI, without bothering to evaluate anything I said. It didn’t come up with this on its own. It just pulled sources for me and raised points such as the diesel expert ban, which I was not aware of. I offered my own thoughts too.
AI will at least engage with my point. I’ve yet to hear anyone here, despite all these downvotes, interested in talking about the Russian diesel ban.
When you guys read from wherever you get your stuff, a lot of it is AI generated and you don’t even know it. It’s unavoidable, and it isn’t my fault.
AI did not help me write this.