GoodBearComics | website

Transcript

4 Panel Comic

Panel 1: Ron Weasley sits in front of a fireplace with a Gameboy Yellow with Pokémon Red in hand.

Ron: Harry, these muggle games are so fun!

Panel 2: Harry Potter sits across the fireplace from Ron and holds his wand and a Gameboy Red with the screen and wand pointing at Ron.

Potter: Ron, look! My Pokémon is evolving from Abra to Kadabra!

Panel 3: Harry is horrified as magic flies from his wand

Panel 4: Harry comes to the depressing realization of what he’s done.

  • yyyesss?@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    money given to Thomas isn’t still being actively used to oppress or harm people.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It was a bit, the creator Wilbert Awdry was against the modernisation and the nationalisation of the british railways and would frequently push agenda’s in his Thomas series that was very anti-diesel, and then later very anti-electric. His works increasingly pandered towards his beliefs about current events:

      Beginning in the 1950s, Awdry began to shift how he wrote the Railway Series and included the real-world element of the conflict between steam and diesel engines.[17] During the 1950s, the British Railways (BR) began to modernise the railway network, withdrawing their steam engines and replacing them with the modern diesel engine. While that was happening in the real world, in Awdry’s fictional universe, he “began more frequently referencing a place known as “The Other Railway”, often using it as a foil to his utopian Island of Sodor and treating it akin to a steam engine hell. “The Other Railway” represented B.R. and their callous scrapping of countless steam engines”.[17] That shifted the Railway Series from just telling fictional stories in the world Awdry created to paralleling the real world and using events that happened in real life.[17]

      The lady who would later try to rein him in and make his stories more kid-friendly and made his works viable for television was met with total scorn by him for what he percieved to be bastardizing his works. He was not a friendly person.

      • xspurnx@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        When we compare being against progress with being against trans people I sure as hell won’t waste a tear for a Diesel engine.

        • tetris11@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          is it? depends on how much you weigh current suffering over past suffering, which is a tricky one I admit

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I don’t think it’s that tricky. If someone intends their art to be divisive and evil, and after their death it’s repurposed for good I consider it a win against that evil.

            If Rowling wasn’t still making money and causing harm, I’d be all about celebrating and expanding the Harry Potter series in a manner that incorprates messages of inclusion.

            • tetris11@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I’ll be pedantic and say that repurposed for good in a current setting doesn’t then prevent it from then being repurposed for bad in a later setting