• zikzak025@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Author intent stops meaning anything outside the head of the author anyways. Individual perception is the only source of meaning. No one can understand a subject without the context of their culture and personal experiences. Hence why two people can interpret the same subject in different ways that are both valid.

    That may sound overly reductionist, but that’s genuinely what it boils down to. Someone’s artistic intent could be pretending to be stupid to prove a point, but if the audience only sees a stupid person, the author has no control of the message.

    • laranis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      In the context of they sorts of literary analysis done at the high school or early university level, there does end up being a right and a wrong. Maybe that’s what turned me off to that sort of discussion: the downplaying of my experience with a work in favor of the “right” interpretation.

      • inconsistent_octopus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This is a common low-level approach to literature, but I think it’s a really stupid and bad approach. In some ways, it’s a response to the political demand to quantify and standardize education. I think it turns many people away from reading.