• melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    On a semi-related note, anyone using a self-hosted Steam-like experience like Drop OSS or similar? I’ve been meaning to try out Drop because my family has a few gaming machines that would benefit from the ease of a store like Steam, but I refuse run anything with DRM or to let any games or clients like Steam have an internet connection to collect data.

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Faster at being a shitty platform does not make it a better platform. Just a faster one.

  • distante@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    My gaming just happens on a SteamDeck. There I do not feel the launcher slow. Is it a Windows thing?

  • Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Faster at what?

    While developing the “slow” Steam store, Valve contributed to the make Linux a viable gaming platform. What were you cunts doing while this was happening? Shouting from the sidelines that Linux gaming was never going to work due to fragmentation and minimal use base.

    Wankers.

      • Quazatron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, I don’t really remember it but I know they were not helpful at all.

        I’ve seen Linux gaming evolve from having nearly zero games, through the Loki ports giving us some hope, to Steam games basically working nearly seamlessly by using Wine/Proton as an impedance layer.

        Valve always treated me well as a customer, but most importantly contributed back to the community.

        These idiots now present themselves with a slop coded piece of junk and say “Look how fast this thing starts!”

        I would slap them silly with a wet handdock if I could.

      • Derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I never heard about that. Was it due to moving the games to their own storefront that had no Linux support? Or straight up removed it with no sensible explanation? Got any specific games in mind?

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Rocket League was one

          I believe it was delisted on steam as well, but it still removed support for players at the time

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Yes, we’re all very desperate to leave the Steam ecosystem, we’re just waiting for … checks notes … a slightly faster launcher.

    Yes, that’s it: a slightly faster launcher.

    • nous@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No, no. You forgot about this:

      The announcement post also warns that the vibe-coded Preview is currently “light on features”

      So a slightly faster launcher that is light on features!

      • Derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Wait, light on features? That’s the current EGS, lol. What else are they gonna shave off? Launching a game? The UI so it is now in a command line? The whole store?

        • wibble@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          That’s actually a great feature. To be able to type launch <game> from my terminal and not see the store… Fuzzy matching and list completion would even make it better - that could even tie into a store link. launch rocket gets you two games you own in a list and 3 marked with a store icon. Boom! Over to you, Valve

    • ekZepp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’m sorry Steam, is not you. But that new launcher is so slightly faster… I can’t resist.

    • NoLemurs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      The hilarious part is, yes, I don’t care how fast my launcher is.

      But… also, Steam is by far the slowest, least responsive program on my computer.

      “Faster than Steam” feels like a joke.

      I don’t use a lot of non-open source applications (and not a lot of desktop applications generally). Have they gotten so bad that the slowness of Steam doesn’t feel bad to people anymore?

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think it’s just a select few people that have issues with Steam. I’ve never once thought or felt that steam was slow. Some games start up slow, but that’s not because of Steam. Just using the program is quite responsive.

    • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      tbh it was a legitimate issue with the epic launcher the last time i used it: everything loaded for three seconds each time since it was some sort of prohibitively bloated framework web app

      • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Yeah it legit took more than a minute to launch the fucking barebone app, that’s the reason most people haven’t been using the store. It’s definitely because the launch speed is so so slow that people not using it, good on them to make it usable, now maybe fix the other thing.

  • Davel23@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The best part is Steam released an update just one day later that loads faster than the Slopic Launcher.

    • EtzBetz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No. The update process can be a tad bit slow sometimes, but the as actual usage etc. is very fine.

      Epic Games on the other hand I had countless times of installing or just starting where it would just ramp up system resources and wouldn’t get going.

    • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I love steam but I have to admit it’s rather slow both on Windows and Linux.

      Isn’t steam kind of web based and so always a bit slow because of that ?

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I guess I can’t really relate. Games usually launch within 3-5 seconds for me. Sometimes it can take longer when it has to do whatever it does with vulkan shaders, but that’s usually only first time launches or after some updates.

    • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      On my old pc it take about 30 second from PC finished booting to launching Steam in Big Picture, not sure what happened because on my new PC it just launched within second.

  • Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m glad I didn’t pay for any of the games on it, makes it really easy to just uninstall and never go back ☺️

  • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Like the launcher or not, this will lead to more in roads for games made in Unreal to be able to have native Linux builds

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      They removed native Linux ports from games and updated others so they would no longer work on Linux or in proton. They made it this way.