The AI didn’t draw the conclusions, and modern AI isn’t even needed. I’ve used NN a decade ago for similar results, it’s fairly simple with a good training set.
I discredit those willingly associated with fascists, as well as those willingly associated with tankies (different flavor of the same shit). But in this case, the extension wasn’t needed, just a reminder I need to update my ban list.
You’re sure making a lot of assumptions in this post, about me and the methodology of this research. AI was used, as I claimed it was, and you have no idea in what manner it was used because you clearly neither read the article or investigated any of its claims. Go ahead and keep inventing your own reality and protecting it with your ban list, I couldn’t possibly care any less.
No, I read the text. No AI/machine concluded the drop, and you can read that on the site itself. The quantity of messages classified as pro Russian aggression dropped. That classification is a very mature technology. You said AI only to sew distrust. If the article claimed checked manually you would claim bias.
This is seagulling. “I am just saying…(while willingly skipping reality)”
And you are willingly affiliated with a tankie instance, no assumption there. I don’t know it you’re a tankie, and I haven’t said you’re, but brown and in the toilet tends to be shit and not chocolate.
Curious to know how you can claim AI usage. I would suspect you’re just trying low effort discredit, but seeing the ml there’s no need to suspect.
I read the article and looked up the system they used for it. But go ahead and use an instance url to baselessly discredit what im saying.
The AI didn’t draw the conclusions, and modern AI isn’t even needed. I’ve used NN a decade ago for similar results, it’s fairly simple with a good training set.
I discredit those willingly associated with fascists, as well as those willingly associated with tankies (different flavor of the same shit). But in this case, the extension wasn’t needed, just a reminder I need to update my ban list.
You’re sure making a lot of assumptions in this post, about me and the methodology of this research. AI was used, as I claimed it was, and you have no idea in what manner it was used because you clearly neither read the article or investigated any of its claims. Go ahead and keep inventing your own reality and protecting it with your ban list, I couldn’t possibly care any less.
No, I read the text. No AI/machine concluded the drop, and you can read that on the site itself. The quantity of messages classified as pro Russian aggression dropped. That classification is a very mature technology. You said AI only to sew distrust. If the article claimed checked manually you would claim bias. This is seagulling. “I am just saying…(while willingly skipping reality)”
And you are willingly affiliated with a tankie instance, no assumption there. I don’t know it you’re a tankie, and I haven’t said you’re, but brown and in the toilet tends to be shit and not chocolate.