The Trump administration recently published “America’s AI Action Plan”. One of the first policy actions from the document is to eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change from the NIST’s AI Risk Framework.

Lacking any sense of irony, the very next point states LLM developers should ensure their systems are “objective and free from top-down ideological bias”.

Par for the course for Trump and his cronies, but the world should know what kind of AI the US wants to build.

    • Tony Bark@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      In this case? Yeah. There will always be someone with a copy of the code. They just spin up a new model and share it with the world. It’s like The Pirate Bay. No matter how hard they try to destroy the site, it always comes back.

      • brianpeiris@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think the bipartisan TAKE IT DOWN bill has and will have a substantial effect on the proliferation of open source deepfake models. Sure, a tech savvy individual will still be able to download a model themselves and do whatever, but it significantly different from having deepfake services readily available for millions to use. Is it absolute enforcement, no, but it has a substantial effect on the world.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          At this point any idiot can buy drugs on the dark web. We know this because many do it wrong. The same will apply to deepfake websites.

        • Tony Bark@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          How did we get to talking about deepfakes? They’re trying to stop honest discussions about misinformation, diversity, equity, inclusion, and climate change.

            • Tony Bark@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Fair enough. That being said, deepfake services doesn’t need to be open source. Anything that presents to the masses is obviously going to be enforced but that doesn’t necessarily translate back to the open source supply chain.

              • brianpeiris@lemmy.caOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I’m not sure if this has happened yet, but in theory the TAKE IT DOWN act could be used to shutdown an open source deepfake code or model repository. In that case you’re right that there will be copies that spring up, but I think it is significant that popular projects could be taken down like that.

                • Tony Bark@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Glad we got that out of the way. Now can we get back to Trump’s EO so I can stop feeling like I’m feeling devil’s advocate here?

                  • brianpeiris@lemmy.caOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Sure. My understanding of your original comment was that Trump’s EO won’t matter to open source AI because regulations, or lack of regulations, won’t affect open source AI. My point is that regulations do affect open source AI in some significant way.