inari@piefed.zip to Programming@programming.devEnglish · edit-221 hours agoI built a programming language that LLMs can't useblog.picheta.meexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up172arrow-down123 cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up149arrow-down1external-linkI built a programming language that LLMs can't useblog.picheta.meinari@piefed.zip to Programming@programming.devEnglish · edit-221 hours agomessage-square29fedilink cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up45arrow-down2·18 hours agoThis is interesting because even though they designed the language to be impossible for LLMs to use, Claude still scored nearly 70% on their benchmark.
minus-squareOldMrFish@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down3·edit-211 hours agoAlternative headline: Claude scores 70% on benchmark in esoteric language it hasn’t been trained on. That’s basically an ad for Claude Code…
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 hours agoNot only was Claude not trained on it, but the language is actively trying to be hostile towards it.
minus-squareMirodir@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up22arrow-down2·13 hours agoAnd that’s without any of this being in its training set. I wonder if they realized how big of a self own that is.
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·11 hours agoHow the hell is this a “self own”?
This is interesting because even though they designed the language to be impossible for LLMs to use, Claude still scored nearly 70% on their benchmark.
Alternative headline: Claude scores 70% on benchmark in esoteric language it hasn’t been trained on. That’s basically an ad for Claude Code…
Not only was Claude not trained on it, but the language is actively trying to be hostile towards it.
And that’s without any of this being in its training set. I wonder if they realized how big of a self own that is.
How the hell is this a “self own”?