• the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Imo, having Proton just copy Google but actually be private is exactly what I want. Of course, if they stray away from privacy then there will be issues. I also feel like they are making good stuff. As a subscriber myself I don’t have many issues with their offering other than the stuff they don’t provide but Google does.

    • disco@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They’ll never do it. They’ve proven they have no integrity and your data is too valuable.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I don’t believe they will be able to compete with Google/OpenAI in a direct battle by having a 1:1 LLM product copy but with privacy. The costs are likely too high for an organisation like Proton and their LLM is likely to have significantly subpar output.

      Don’t get me wrong, I am all for a private, cloud LLM, but I would rather they came up with novel usbaility features, a better front-end for evaluating sources (and faster identification of errors and hallucinations) and so on.

      I am not seeing any of that.

      • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I don’t believe they will be able to compete with Google/OpenAI in a direct battle

        I don’t know about that. From my experience, community AI models (both image generation and LLMs) are often far, far superior to whatever large corporations can dish out within the same size bracket