• YeahToast@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    If it turns out that he was in a psychosis or whatever, it doesn’t excuse what he did but it might explain it. Why that is important is because you need to put in mechanisms to stop/minimize it in the future.

    • Alamutjones@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s an issue the woman he ran over campaigned on, and was actively in meetings with the government a few days before the incident to try to correct. Health care access in the region was Helen Haines’ big Thing

      I absolutely get what you’re saying with explanation vs excuse. I agree with you as far as that goes. He sounds like he was very ill.

      My point is that he’s still very nearly killed someone, and the person he chose was actively working to help him. There have to be consequences for that, even though he’s so ill.

      Stick him in Thomas Embling, get him the care he needs and keep him from doing any more harm

      • YeahToast@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah I agree in principle. Unless they find he was trying to manage his mental health and was rejected etc etc (mental health is shitly managed) . But otherwise I agree, do the crime pay the time .