• prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    It comes down to your definitit of healthy.

    There is a difference between obsession / paranoia regarding privacy and wanting to keep your data private as a default.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I would argue it’s also convenience as well.

      I think most people would tell you they want their data private as default. The fact of the matter though, that many in places like this don’t want to hear, is the majority of people simply do not give a shit.

      That doesn’t mean they’re wrong headed or don’t care about privacy. It just means the convenience is more important.

      Fact of the matter is if you use a computer attached to The Internet nothing is private. If you think this I have a bridge to sell you.

      • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yes, network effect goes brrrr. It is hard to get people to care enough to Jump ship to let’s say signal.

        About the bridge: I am using only free software. I use the PC to look up info, watch shows(local), send encrypted messages and play games (local and von with friends). Where is the privacy intrusion? My IP and metadata?

        • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Web fingerprinting is a bitch (DNS too), also it’s likely you have at least one non-free blob (mostly software freedom rather than privacy being concerned here), otherwise mostly lgtm