• FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 days ago

    AI has never been 100% accurate to the documents it pretends to reference, so the fact that anybody could even consider reading it like it’s not pure gibberish is mind boggling to me.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      I gave Claude a document to proofread today. It came back with an error. Clause said I used “told” instead of “tell.” The error ended up being Claude’s error, as I used “tell,” and it was just confused.

      This was the first time I ever used Claude. Just wanted to see what it was like. It did apologize, in fairness. But yeah, it’s clearly fallible. I guess I don’t understand it well enough to get how it read the document incorrectly. I’m baffled.

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s because it’s a statistical model that guesses the next word. You asked it to read a document and formulate a response. So, based on responses in the dataset to the documents in the dataset, it chose the words and phrases which were most likely to be in a response.

        Statistically, the most likely result the machine could come up with, was that you had used the wrong word. Factually, you did not.