• Zarobi@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Refuse to use LLMs; don’t use / train your replacement. Change careers, pivot to something you can’t be replaced by LLMs. Could still be programming in an industry that doesn’t use them for privacy or security reasons.

    • Nine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      Not using LLMs (and other tools) isn’t realistic. The proverbial toothpaste is already out of the tube, sadly. There aren’t going to be many/any industries that won’t be using them in some way.

      I think the more realistic option is to use them in a responsible way and advocate for that.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They’re used now throughout healthcare, banking, and defense. So even among some of the most regulated and privacy-conscious spaces, many are using these tools. Refusing to use them outright is a sensible position, but it is going to get more and more difficult.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Probably fine. But I would be suspicious of any usage of the tool that removes too much of your job. Let’s say for example you can send an A.I. to attend meetings in your place, or an A.I. that automatically does performance reviews and check ins with subordinates. That would be a risky thing to do haha

        I think that’s still a bit in the future yet, though. Just keep it in the back of your mind if you notice the tool “helping too much”