Other finance gurus have pointed to the fact that AI agents might simply go haywire, regardless of what they’ve been instructed to do.
“You’re assuming they’re going to act properly on your behalf and they may not,” JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon told a room full of economists and financial experts in Chicago earlier this month. “You can’t stop it. You just have to, like, manage the hell out of it.”
Jamie fucking Dimon having a sensible take on AI was not on my bingo card for 2026
Banks Preparing for Aftermath of Unprecedented Catastrophe Caused by AI: “You can’t stop it.”
That’s because they don’t act, they generate. Generate this, generate that. With some probability and degree of fitting the criteria set, much better than spewing random sequences.
One can manage people the same way as LLMs, one can’t manage LLMs the same way as people.
And if you build proper processes in managing people, using people might be more profitable honestly in everything I can imagine, even support bots, that employs people.
Jamie fucking Dimon having a sensible take on AI was not on my bingo card for 2026
That’s because they don’t act, they generate. Generate this, generate that. With some probability and degree of fitting the criteria set, much better than spewing random sequences.
One can manage people the same way as LLMs, one can’t manage LLMs the same way as people.
And if you build proper processes in managing people, using people might be more profitable honestly in everything I can imagine, even support bots, that employs people.