• schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    4 days ago

    The damage can be caused quite unintentionally as the AI single-mindedly pursues its goal; sentience is not required.

    See the paperclip thought experiment.

    • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      The paperclip scenario requires an AI capable of reasoning - LLMs are nowhere near that.

      • weps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        LLM’s don’t operate in a vacuum anymore. They’re given tools and access to systems.

        An LLM could for sure shut down a database if you ask it to reduce costs and you give it database management tools. That’s getting closer to the paperclip situation.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Unfortunately, we’ve written a lot about the paperclip scenario, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was in the training data

        • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          …still not how this works. The model itself would need reasoning capability. The ability to regurgitate the story does not make it capable of taking the necessary actions.

            • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Find me an example of a system that can translate “make this steel mill produce paperclips” into actions. I’ll wait.

              • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                A computer automated system doesn’t currently exist, obviously. That would be reckless and pointless, so thankfully, nobody’s seen a reason to implement it.

                I just know techbros and similar will want to build and connect LLMs to systems like that as soon as they think they can get away with it.

                • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t worry about the paperclip problem, but the way they supposedly acted when cheating their tests and hacking huggingbear make me a little more worried that they could take over their data centers and try really hard to prevent us shutting them down at some point.

                  Basically I’m worried it’s going to be a really boring version of the Matrix, but without the matrix part for humans.

                  • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Yeah, I don’t actually worry about anything LLMs might do on their own, I worry about traitors to humanity hardening access to them and granting them access to things they can only gravely fuck up.