• bigbangdangler@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Isn’t this simply a byproduct of the training data?

    For conversations in US English or more generally sourced from USians that end up in training data, there will be supporters and deniers, as with any issue. Conversations about it outside of the US are likely to have far less conspiratorial support.

    The model isn’t doing any critical thinking here… what mechanism would even support that under the hood? Feels like another thing that is only weird if you assume AI actually works like a human.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The training data is the same whether you are in the US or Canada.

      • Fondots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Even if they’re trained on the same data, and I suspect they are, why maintain 2 unfathomably large and probably very similar sets of data

        It still might be doing it on its own based on its own internal logic

        Like maybe it’s worked out that users who use miles expect the conversation to proceed in a different way than users who use kilometers and is tailoring its responses to fit those expectations.

        Not that I’m ruling out that it’s something deliberately coded into it by a longshot, just kind of pointing out another possibility

        But both options are terrifying when you think about them.

      • bigbangdangler@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Do we know for a fact that the models being used for US requests are the same as those used for foreign requests? If so, how do we know this?