• [object Object]@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ah that explains it. But why would they bother with the dots? Perhaps to make it clear to others that the window is compliant? All the information I can find online seems to suggest that it’s the dots that makes the window visible to the birds.

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      From the wiki for bird-window collisions:

      There are several methods of preventing bird-window strikes. The use of ultraviolet (UV) signals to make windows appear visible to birds, while once one of the most common means of combatting this issue, is no longer recommended by experts. This is because while some birds can see UV light, not all can. Other solutions include window film (as long as it is placed on the exterior of the glass) and ceramic frit glass (glass with fritdots).[30] Windows can also be covered with decals spaced no more than 5 cm horizontally or 10 cm vertically to prevent collisions.[31]

      I had assumed it was cheaper to do dots, but it’s actually just more broadly effective. That’s a better reason :)

    • Clambake0351@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Dots are cheaper than UV filters and easier to apply retroactively. Both have the same effect of creating a visible obstruction for birds to discourage strikes.

    • Edges@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Dots and UV are different solutions to the same problem, they both make the glass visible to birds. Its one or the other usually, not both.