My question was why did you assume they made shitty houses? Why did you assume they got rid of regulations? Neither of these things were suggested even remotely in the article.
Also I don’t know where you got the idea that good regulation on homes slows down development. What we have is the exact opposite. Which is poor regulation which leads to shitty homes. And bad zoning laws which slows down development. Are you equating zoning laws and regulation? Do you think those are the same thing? Cuz they’re not.
Because that’s what happens when you have less regulation. See cities hit by hurricanes and earthquakes and floods and fires
Good regulations on new housing slows developments, but saves lives and prevents hoards of homeless folks
My question was why did you assume they made shitty houses? Why did you assume they got rid of regulations? Neither of these things were suggested even remotely in the article.
Also I don’t know where you got the idea that good regulation on homes slows down development. What we have is the exact opposite. Which is poor regulation which leads to shitty homes. And bad zoning laws which slows down development. Are you equating zoning laws and regulation? Do you think those are the same thing? Cuz they’re not.