• chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t know about the specific scenario in the comic, but it seems understandable to be afraid of being perceived as racist just because of how much of a touchy subject it is, if you aren’t able to be confident in knowing how what you say will be interpreted.

    • Saapas@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      To me it’s hard to see this comic without thinking we’re supposed to laugh at the ridiculousness of the person in it and not as much sympathize with his position

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I honestly think the intent is both. It’s funny because we can recognize it’s a bit ridiculous, and still see ourselves in that position

    • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s exactly the problem. Anything can be touchy or sensible for at least one person. You don’t know what will trigger someone. That kind lf overcorrectionism is hazardous as it might cause everyone to freeze and be unable to say virtually anithing out of fear of touching anyone else’s sensibility.

      I think freedom of speech should only be limited in the case of immediate and/or evident danger, but not just by mere feelings or sensibilities.