The gimmicks I decribed are in the same category with the AI usage.
Its double standard when your friend buys a new iphone every year, and you say nothing to him, but when they use AI you start the debate. Its based on stealing others countries minerals / work, and its bad for the planet.
you’re making assumptions about people not saying anything, based on the (observed) behaviour of 4% of the population, and then, believing yourself to be the only one to either a) call people out and living as you’re learning, or b) not caring even a bit, take an assumed moral high ground which given a) is amazingly narrow-minded, or given b) is downright disturbing.
people do what they can, and they should be commended when they change for the better. a tool notably does what it’s designed to do, and should be criticised if that thing is bad.
what?
The gimmicks I decribed are in the same category with the AI usage.
Its double standard when your friend buys a new iphone every year, and you say nothing to him, but when they use AI you start the debate. Its based on stealing others countries minerals / work, and its bad for the planet.
ah, so you’re making assumptions. i see.
No assumptions. This is how the modern society works. USA is 4% of the world’s population and consumes around 25%. And it is just a country.
you’re making assumptions about people not saying anything, based on the (observed) behaviour of 4% of the population, and then, believing yourself to be the only one to either a) call people out and living as you’re learning, or b) not caring even a bit, take an assumed moral high ground which given a) is amazingly narrow-minded, or given b) is downright disturbing.
people do what they can, and they should be commended when they change for the better. a tool notably does what it’s designed to do, and should be criticised if that thing is bad.