R3N5656@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 hours agoNo need to reproduce 💜lemmy.worldimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1436arrow-down14
arrow-up1432arrow-down1imageNo need to reproduce 💜lemmy.worldR3N5656@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 hours agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squarerestingOface@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 hours agoI didn’t understand it until I read the title
minus-squareAliOski@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·8 hours agoThe vagueness is what made it funny, you could interpret it in multiple ways, but the implication of “being enough” meaning “not needing more of you” was in itself funny. Making a remark that you shouldn’t reproduce is just distasteful.
I didn’t understand it until I read the title
The vagueness is what made it funny, you could interpret it in multiple ways, but the implication of “being enough” meaning “not needing more of you” was in itself funny. Making a remark that you shouldn’t reproduce is just distasteful.