Ajuy@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 days agoWorld-renowned AI scientist Geoffrey Hinton says it might turn out humans would have been better off without AIwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square231fedilinkarrow-up1609arrow-down117cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1592arrow-down1external-linkWorld-renowned AI scientist Geoffrey Hinton says it might turn out humans would have been better off without AIwww.theguardian.comAjuy@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 days agomessage-square231fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareRumRunningDevil@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 hours agoHonest question. Why would you want “true AI”? This is like saying “true mega bubonic-AIDS can be made if we do XYZ”. Stop, stop making mega bubonic-AIDS
minus-squareChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 hours ago Honest question. Why would you want “true AI”? I always viewed it as an engineering challenge, without really seeing or caring about the literally existential threat that it represents. At this point in my life, however, I would not want true AI, as I mentioned in my comment.
Honest question. Why would you want “true AI”?
This is like saying “true mega bubonic-AIDS can be made if we do XYZ”.
Stop, stop making mega bubonic-AIDS
I always viewed it as an engineering challenge, without really seeing or caring about the literally existential threat that it represents. At this point in my life, however, I would not want true AI, as I mentioned in my comment.