I’ve been wondering this question for a while. Ignoring current events, why is a little bit of inflation desirable?

I do understand that it’s done to “stimulate” the economy so people don’t let their cash rot in a checking account, but isn’t it a zero-sum game? Everybody says that money is not meant to stay where it is, rather, should flow through the economy. But if the economy always needs injections of liquidity because otherwise it fails, isn’t the economy broken?

I feel like there’s something I can’t comprehend about that.

  • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I don’t understand why you call it worse, or even bad at all.

    your money buys more tomorrow than today

    This is evidently good.

    you hold off spending it

    Also good. Save money for retirement and emergencies.

    Done en masse, that causes demand to drop

    Less consumerism. Good again.

    companies have to lower prices further

    Still good. More acquisitive power for consumers, less money for CEOs, stockholders, and similar parasites.

    More incentive to increase production efficiency and reduce waste, while proper regulations and actually punitive fines and civil and criminal responsibility for executives, board members, and stockholders keep salaries and quality up.

    The concept of infinite growth has been raping and murdering the world for way too long. This looks like it would put a hard stop to it.

    which means more deflation

    So far so good?

    It’s a self-perpetuating cycle

    Sounds great, to be honest!

    (Though, to be fair, prices would only keep lowering until goods are sold for what they actually cost to produce, including salaries and whatnot, with occasional drops due to increased efficiencies; the system would thus stabilise at an actually reasonable level, as opposed to the current ultraconsumerist madness.)

    • Jimbabwe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Think about your boss dropping your paycheck down to $200 a month (because money is so valuable now), but your rent is locked in at $1200 a month.

      • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Not wanting parasites to keep burning the world for short term profit is not thinking communally…?

        • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s obviously not what I’m referring to. I ignored the environmental stuff as I don’t want to get off topic. Your points aren’t invalid, but they are off topic. Try to focus please.

          Back to the actual economics we’re talking about. You’re thinking only about the money going into your pocket. You’re not thinking about the functioning of society as a whole. And you’re not looking more than two inches in front of your face. The deflationary cycle is also self-perpetuating because it also involves cutting demand for not just goods, but labor. Look at the Great Depression if you want to see what a deflationary spiral looks like.

        • CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          What they should have said is that a system built on specific numbers going up to generate investment hype needs those numbers to keep going up and the easiest way to have the number go up is inflation.