I’m splitting this into two parts. First identifying the issue. And second my personal idea for a solution. I’m hoping for a lot of discussion so please be clear which part you are responding to.
Part 1: The problem
Reddit as a platform has many flaws. Obviously being a corporation means they’re terrible no matter what. But their platform is also flawed. Even if Reddit was 100% community owned the platform would still be flawed. The number one thing that is ruining Reddit are the tyrannical mods.
Each community on Reddit is a dictatorship. Whoever is arbitrarily in charge of a community has full unrestricted power to do whatever they want. The people who are actually creating the content and sharing it are totally at their whim. I understand that modding is a difficult and thankless job, but toxic mods ruined Reddit and Lemmy will do the same if it’s not addressed.
Lemmy’s answer is to allow people to create their own instances. Don’t like the mods at World? Go make your own Lemmy, with blackjack and hookers. But that’s not sufficient. It takes years to build up a community to have enough people for meaningful discussion to happen, and nearly all communities or instances fail. We absolutely need a way for mods to answer to the users.
Part 2: My solution
My solution is simple. Lemmy is built on the community. Everyone helps run it. Therefore mods are elected by the users who generate the highest upvoted content in a community.
Elections should happen on a schedule and, if a community is particularly upset with a mod, a vote of no confidence can be taken.
I understand that this will be a huge undertaking. But I truly believe that we need to fix this issue for Lemmy to thrive long term. Or else we’ll just end up with another Reddit.
wow, that may be the worst idea for the direction of lemmy since the Tesseract guy. bravo
How should it be done better?
By changing the premise completely. You fall straight on the flat edge of the very fallacy that drives sites like Reddit: that popularity is an indicator of quality. (And even worse, mistaking “popularity of A” with “quality of B”). Just a hint: Donald Trump won the popular vote. So has Netanyahu.
It’s your premise people are disagreeing with, not your proposal. You have created a proposal to fix something most people don’t see as being a legitimate problem. There’s nothing to discuss or improve, the disagreement is more fundamental than that. You haven’t successfully argued that there is a real problem in the first place.
If you want to convince people your way is better, you probably have to implement it and show them it’s better.
(Spoiler alert: It probably isn’t better. It’s one of those “sounds great in theory, sucks shit in practice” ideas, I think it will be taken advantage of and turn toxic very quickly.)
I kind of agree with the others here. the current system is fine, but if you don’t like it, make your own instance. lemmy has some problem mods, but they are far from the biggest issue
kylie_kraft was being a little harsh there. Your idea isn’t really that bad, thanks for taking the time to write it up and bring it up for discussion.