Every source with credibility to comment on this isn’t connecting it to the new AI software, specifically. Even those with incentive to. For example, SA’s sources point to the Trump staffing cuts and a failure of older systems:
CBS News reported that a software update to the private communications system may have triggered a system-wide reboot, causing it to crash.
“It would be unusual for them to do a software update during the day, but the FAA is very short-staffed,” Stilwell says. Department of Government Efficiency-related cuts laid off hundreds of FAA workers last year.
To be clear, there’s no indication so far that the ground stop today was caused by anything related to the AI rollout. Officials haven’t said they believe the two are connected, and they are still trying to find the cause of the communications failure. Still, you can see why the timing might make people wonder what’s up.
Not that AI software deservers to be exonerated, nor that the timing isn’t suspicious, but there is just zero evidence so far.
I am posting this because I am sick of seeing Futurism’s ragebait headlines in /c/technology. Nearly every one is just attention optimized tabloid clickbait, hence I simply do not trust the more plausible sounding headlines like this.
TBH I am close to just blocking few users that post Futurism. As when I bring this up in the more obvious clickbait threads, OP never seems to respond… and I came to Lemmy for better information hygiene in my feeds, not worse.
Or experts on the topic, like former air traffic contollers? Or software engineers that worked with this stuff? Or news instututions with decades of credibility?
I understand the conflict-of-interest concerns, but I suppose I am an ‘oldschool’ believer in journalistic standards, primary sources, and topical experts
On the contrary, why would I trust the headline of a single for-profit news site, one that regularly posts clickbait? Because it happens to align with a popular viewpoint?
“Failure in older systems” likely means that the new system created so much data it overwhelmed the old system. THAT would be a self-own DOS and poor planning. Therefore, it was caused by the new system rollout.
Every source with credibility to comment on this isn’t connecting it to the new AI software, specifically. Even those with incentive to. For example, SA’s sources point to the Trump staffing cuts and a failure of older systems:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/faa-grounds-all-u-s-flights-days-after-expanding-its-ai-air-traffic-system/
And NPR: https://www.npr.org/2026/11/13/nx-s1-6040403/faa-nationwide-groundstop-airports
And another that addresses this explicitly:
https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/this-week-the-faa-rolled-out-ai-air-traffic-management-then-it-grounded-flights-nationwide/91437031
Not that AI software deservers to be exonerated, nor that the timing isn’t suspicious, but there is just zero evidence so far.
I am posting this because I am sick of seeing Futurism’s ragebait headlines in /c/technology. Nearly every one is just attention optimized tabloid clickbait, hence I simply do not trust the more plausible sounding headlines like this.
TBH I am close to just blocking few users that post Futurism. As when I bring this up in the more obvious clickbait threads, OP never seems to respond… and I came to Lemmy for better information hygiene in my feeds, not worse.
why would anyone trust official statements from this current administraton or various billionaire owned news stations?
Or experts on the topic, like former air traffic contollers? Or software engineers that worked with this stuff? Or news instututions with decades of credibility?
I understand the conflict-of-interest concerns, but I suppose I am an ‘oldschool’ believer in journalistic standards, primary sources, and topical experts
On the contrary, why would I trust the headline of a single for-profit news site, one that regularly posts clickbait? Because it happens to align with a popular viewpoint?
my dad worked for the ffa for 27 years, their upper leadership is fucking bad
we got anything from current workers doing the actual work in this mess?
edit:
https://lemmy.world/post/54413737
There IS evidence.
“Failure in older systems” likely means that the new system created so much data it overwhelmed the old system. THAT would be a self-own DOS and poor planning. Therefore, it was caused by the new system rollout.
What about the possibility of an Iranian cyberattack?! Uh oh, spaghettios!
Agree. Think I’ll block eiker now.