Bidah@thelemmy.club to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoyikeslemmy.mlimagemessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up1243arrow-down138
arrow-up1205arrow-down1imageyikeslemmy.mlBidah@thelemmy.club to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square64fedilink
minus-squareHiddenLayer555@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 days agoI’m ugly with hair, losing it won’t make me that much uglier.
minus-squareseralth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoBald is an improvement in a lot of cases. Unless your my dad who has a vendeta against his skull and has given him self more lumps then Elmer fudd.
minus-squaregodlessworm [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoeh you probably look fine. imo very few people are actually “ugly”
minus-squarefrightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoAs of this writing, most research on physical attractiveness (and other measures of attractiveness) that I have read shows normal distributions in its samples. So about ⅙ of people are ugly if that adjective means ‘one standard deviation below’.
I’m ugly with hair, losing it won’t make me that much uglier.
Bald is an improvement in a lot of cases. Unless your my dad who has a vendeta against his skull and has given him self more lumps then Elmer fudd.
eh you probably look fine. imo very few people are actually “ugly”
As of this writing, most research on physical attractiveness (and other measures of attractiveness) that I have read shows normal distributions in its samples.
So about ⅙ of people are ugly if that adjective means ‘one standard deviation below’.