• roude@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I haven’t reviewed the whole thing, only small parts but it does look to handle online verification better (re: invasiveness).

    There is a section talking about a prototype app already released that is used to store age. It verifies off a couple different government docs (ID, bank details, upcoming Digital ID), but in the end only stores the user’s age (no name, ID, birth date, or other details). The fact page for the app claims that once age is established there is no further contact between the user and age verifier, but of course this is where I likely see the issue with any age verification tool. It’ll depend on whether the verification tool trashes age-related data once done with it, or if they retain a copy for whatever reasons.

    Proof of age is tied to the age required per country per activity, but this sounds far more reasonable than having a single company verify and manage age data (Persona in the US).

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      prototype app

      Ahh yes, the app that coincidentally locks mobile OSes into the google ecosystem. 🤮

      • roude@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It is a prototype.

        Their development roadmap specifically mentions Android AND iOS versions…

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yes. But it excludes any sort of custom OS versions due to the way it’s implemented. So no Lineage, no Graphene.