• slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    No, you can go fuck yourself. Why should the company that made the abomination of JIRA and confluence be permitted to make an llm?

    • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re not making an llm. He’s commenting on fair use and copyright laws. Copyright has been broken for a long time. AI just highlights it. It needs to be reimagined.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    You know what? I’ve decided that it’s very important for my personal development that I should have access to all books, music, movie and cultural artifacts of any kind for free. I reckon it’s fair use.

    So from now on, I will pirate everything I want to read, listen to or watch, and I will visit museums and art exhibits without paying the entry fee. Because it’s me and I’m special.

  • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think it’s not controversial to say content creators need to get paid for the content they create. But I think we need to find a way to do that while adapting to this new era of AI.

    • Salvo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      By making people building AI models to pay their fair share.

      Considering that they are developing something that will be taking away future profits from existing (and future) creators, they must pay proportionate licensing fees. If their business model cants sustain the payment of their licensing fees, they do not have a sustainable model. In which case they can GAGTGF.

      • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s similar to how music went from people buying albums to listening on iPods and phones. You can’t fight the tide, and if you’re not in there proposing solutions, you’ll have to live with someone else’s solution. Streaming (in its current form) isn’t great for artists, but the industry dragged it’s heals for so long they were left with no other choice.

        • Salvo@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The other choices are to buy albums from record stores, or acquire digital music from the High Seas.

          iTunes and Apple Music is still one of the lowest-friction ways to purchase music; while downloaded Apple Music has DRM, iTunes Purchases don’t.

          I have a playlist in iTunes of Apple Music that I want to buy. When I do have some disposable money, I purchase it. I then make sure it is downloaded to a computer so it is backed up in case that record label has a dispute with Apple. Burning to CD is a waste of plastic.